performance – No Added Sugar

Performing Love.

Jozey Wade / June 2, 2014June 2, 2014 / Love, Music, performance, Reflection

So, we did it. ‘Three Words’ made it to the stage… and it’s honestly taken me almost an entire week to come down from the incredible high that evening gave me, and truly take in how it went.

As Gabby said in her blog, the response from the audience was truly astounding. I had spent so much time meticulously over analysing tiny flaws and mistakes in recent weeks, wanting the show to be the best it could be, that I think I had forgotten to truly take in and appreciate what we did have and how an audience might take it. However, as the show opened that night and the audience began laughing in the very first song, I finally started to realise – oh, we have something here. We have a very decent show. And performing it was really like no other experience I had had before.

Again, leading up until the performance I was thinking and worrying constantly about the musical side of my performance, especially playing instruments, as it’s not something I had a great deal of experience with before this show, and, as such, I wasn’t overly confident. However, being out there, I honestly was having so much fun, I almost completely let go of my nerves, for the first time in any performance I’ve done.

Being on the stage for 100% of the show was a huge part of what made this such a different experience for me, performance wise. Being fully immersed in the show throughout, there was no time to come off stage, come out of character and let the nerves take over again about the next scene. In my head, it all just flowed. And it really added to the feeling of team work and camaraderie between the company. We were all on stage, together, supporting each other, working together, throughout the show, and that really added to just how enjoyable and engaging performing it was. Of course, it being the debut performance, there were hitches; technical glitches and a few little performance mistakes. But nothing massive, and I do think we covered any mistakes from the audience well. Of course, those mistakes and glitches are also things we can learn from for any future performances… as quite a few people have mentioned in their blogs, we certainly don’t want this to be the end for No Added Sugar, or ‘Three Words’ itself, and it doesn’t look like it will be. Watch this space!

I always love the shows I am part of, but I have honestly never loved every minute of a performance as much as I loved being part of ‘Three Words’ that night. Furthermore, I am not exaggerating when I say that the process of creating this show has been the most inspiring, rewarding, professional and educational devising process I have ever taken part in. I have pushed myself out of my comfort zone, including performing as myself (something I have previously been reluctant about) as opposed to a character, trying out new performance disciplines (like different kinds of puppetry) and going from being able to play about three chords on guitar very slowly to playing a full song or two in front of an audience. I could not be more glad of every decision we made that pushed me. Even if, by some awfully unfortunate circumstances, No Added Sugar does have to end here, I am taking away so much from this process and from this performance; so many memories, connections with wise, talented people, lessons in performing, lessons in music, and lessons in life… and love.

Endings

Tom Briggs / June 2, 2014June 2, 2014 / performance, Reflection

The above still is taken from about halfway through Three Words it is an ending but it is not the end. I can’t help but feel that this is where we are, showing an arbitrary ‘The end’ sign with every intention of carrying on and taking Three Words out beyond Lincoln. There is a lot of work between now and then to make the show lean enough to be profitable in today’s market but I have no doubt that the company will adapt as it has done until now.

The show started as an idea, the perfect final degree show and the phrase ‘A love letter to Lincoln’ was used frequently, it was to be a play about a place that we knew intimately and of our three years here, based partially on the model of shows like Still House’s Ours Was the Fen Country. Still House’s show is about the way people in the fens live, it is verbatim mixed with physical theatre and it attempted to transplant its audience to a place the majority of us had never seen. Dan Canham, the director, afterwards spoke about the difficulties of touring theatre with such strong affinities to a small community and the limited audiences they have come across (Canham, 2014).

We decided to be more ambitious and with much prodding from outside and in we left the idea of Lincoln behind and the show became less a tribute and more of a re-evaluation of love. Different people, performances and perspectives have shaped Three Words into what it has become. There are many other influences that are well documented but Still House was the first company to really make us re-evaluate exactly what we wanted the show to be and there have been many new developments ad cahnges in direction since, in short our greatest assets have been flexibility and ambition.

As for what happens next we will continue to take influence from other companies in how they operate on and off the stage. We will look to our current friends and support in Lincoln and also to other new and emerging companies and the models they are using to survive and gain notoriety for their work. Having spoken to companies like Unexpected Places, Karkinos Theatre and The Flanagan Collective we are beginning to understand the challenges and the opportunities facing No Added Sugar. So while this is the end of this blog, I’m very happy to say there’s still a long time until the curtain falls on us and Three Words.

Works Cited

Canham, D. (2014) Ours Was the Fen Country. [post-show discussion] Lincoln Performing Arts Centre, 5 February.

No Added Sugar… Are we ready to take the next step?

Gabrielle Ruth Evans / June 2, 2014June 2, 2014 / performance, Reflection

Three Words has been performed. The audience laughed, cried and the overwhelming response from them was astounding, something we had only dreamed of. The performance created a buzz not only on the 27^th May but for the weeks leading up to and the days after. It has been the best pleasure working within the company. We tried to be as professional as we could be and I think we pretty much did just that. On the night as the audience filtered through, and pre-set began. I could not help but think of how the company have bonded and created a piece full of amazement. It lead me to think, what’s next? Where can we go from here? Like in any relationship, it’s the point of which you have put your all into something; it would be a shame if we broke up. Therefore is it time to take the next step and develop our company and performance more. There is much more we can do and add to develop the performance. It is by a long shot not end.

Over the weeks, I have seen each one of us grow support each other and perform to our strengths and work on our weaknesses. On a personal level, although I have found it tough sometimes to take control, by the end I feel I have accomplished my own goals and I am proud of every single one of us. Although on the night some of the harmonies went a little out of tune and some of the piano music went a little off, that is just the pressure of live performance and I do not think it let anyone down it merely added something to the piece.

On a small note, from the beginning on of our aims was for someone to completely learn a new instrument, and Becky did just that. But not only did Becky learn the Glockenspiel, she earned the title of Master of the Glock! Yay!

After this exciting and learning process, I don’t think I am ready to let go of No Added Sugar… therefore all I am going to say is… see you soon!

Photo taken by Linford Butler — Photo by Linford Butler

Audience participation: How did it work on the night?

Lauren Elizabeth Walker / June 1, 2014June 2, 2014 / Love, performance, Reflection

(Butler, L. 2014)

So on the 27^th of May, we performed our debut performance at the LPAC! Also, Phoebe and I had the daunting task of picking two audience members to be wed! This for me was the scene I was worried about the most, firstly because I had written it and I was worried that no one would laugh but also because of all the things that could have gone wrong. Audience participation is such a tricky subject as you can rehearse different scenarios but you never know how its actually going to happen on the night, but how do people actually feel about audience participation? And how did it go down on the night?

“How restrictive, inhibiting, and alienating for the spectator the sitting area of the classical amphitheatre is can be seen especially in the case of a contemporary interactive theatre event largely based on the collaboration of the public”(Sakellardou, 2014).

On the night, we couldn’t really have hoped for it to have gone any better. Walking into the audience was very daunting and we had to make sure that we chose the right audience member. We wanted two people who had never previously met before and we tried to stay away from choosing a drama student as we wanted somebody who would feel awkward about being on the stage. On the night I think we ended up with a drama student, but this didn’t matter to much as you could still see that they felt awkward about being up there! Making them read the speech ‘We don’t want this wedding’ at the end of the scene contributed to spontaneity of the scene and putting the live feed on our participant added pressure to them, but I also feel it aided our performance because the audience got a live view of his reaction. Audience participation can be labelled as cheesy and also more fitting to pantomime than serious theatre, but I feel the way we and other contemporary shows (such as filter) utilise it gives it a fresh and new feel. We used audience participation to put our point across to the audience without simply just delivering a scene to them. Like filter, we allowed the audience to feel as they were in the scene, and to share the awkwardness with the participants on stage. I think this scene will help us to keep up the spontaneity in this performance if we were to perform it again. As every time it will be different and will reflect the mood of the audience, sometimes it could go wrong but I think that is the beauty of audience participation. ‘Organised chaos’ was one of the main things we wanted to achieve when we set out of devising this show and feel this scene did and will create this again!

Butler, L. (2014)

Works cited

Butler,L. (2014)

Sakellardou, E. (2014) ‘”Oh My God, Audience Participation!”: Some Twenty-First-Century Reflections’, Comparative Drama, 48, 1/2, pp. 13-38, International Bibliography of Theatre & Dance with Full Text, EBSCOhost, viewed 2 June 2014.

Our Brief Encounter with the LPAC Stage…

Phoebe Wall-Palmer / June 1, 2014June 2, 2014 / performance, Reflection

“If you died, you’d forget me. And I want to be remembered” (Brief Encounter, 1945)

No Added Sugar has had its 60 minutes on stage. Overwhelmed by positive feedback, we have all hit the post-show blues very hard. We immediately knew that this cannot be the end for us, we cannot be forgotten. There is still obvious ways to develop the scenes – we can cut and change certain bits to make a good show something brilliant. Nothing is ever perfect, which only gives us the urge to keep trying to make ‘Three Words’ better and better

There is one particular scene that I want to reflect on. I have mentioned it, rather ambiguously, in a previous post ‘Gestes de la Romance’. The plan entailed a grand romantic gesture for a member of the audience. It began with a simple gift of chocolates and flowers to an audience member, and ended with me singing Aerosmith’s ‘I don’t Want to Miss a Thing’ under a moving spotlight towards him. It seemed to go very well and was gracefully taken by our audience member. Wanting our first performance to go as best as it could, we selected the person that would receive the gesture previous to the show, and made the necessary steps to make it happen. Therefore my biggest intrigue for when we perform ‘Three Words’ again is how this scene would go when a person is randomly selected. In addition, do we need to make the romantic gesture different, bigger and better each time? It is the type of aspect that would be talked about after a performance, and may not be surprising enough for new audiences if we repeat it. The energy received from the audience really depended on the shock and embarrassment factor. This is all food for thought and I look forward to developing this further.

For now, in the words of Michael Pinchbeck, we have “[Ended] the show with a dot dot dot, not a full stop” (2010)

BassClef707 (2007) Brief Encounter (final scene). [online video] Available from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hubyFqSUaGA [Accessed 1 June 2014].

Pinchbeck, M. (2010) What is The End? [online] Nottingham: Making The End. Available from: http://makingtheend.wordpress.com/page/6/ [Accessed 1 June 2014].